whata the sorty where the king had invisible robes

WHATA THE SORTY WHERE THE KING HAD INVISIBLE ROBES FREE

A lie is to state something untrue with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth. Asking when they have lied can relate their personal experiences to the situation of the individuals in the story, and help them empathize with how the characters in the story felt.Īnother philosophical aspect of honesty that can be examined is what makes a lie. Ask the kids why honesty is important or whether or not you have to be honest to be good. After discussing the possible reasons for being dishonest, kids can be led into the deeper philosophical questions behind these reasons. Reasons rooted in social status, conformity, judgment, trust, and individual morality can all bloom from discussion. A prominent reason is the social fear and anxiety that the suit dilemma presents: that is, if one cannot see the suit, one is stupid and doesn’t deserve a position in society. Kids can analyze the psychology behind the characters lying. The reasons they chose to be dishonest is a good topic for discussion. Every character in the story, except for the young boy, chooses to lie rather than tell the truth about not being able to see the suit. The boy breaks the others out of their self-deception, with his proclamation that “the Emperor isn’t wearing anything at all!” HonestyĮach character’s choice of whether to admit that they can’t see the suit or not is a good prompt for a discussion of honesty. The “logical argument” that the characters are purposefully avoiding is presented at the end of the story by the young and innocent boy. Reasons for their employment of self-deception are discussed further in the sections dealing with conformity and honesty. This process of self-deception is used by virtually every character in the story in order to shelter themselves from the inconvenience of the truth. The “opposing evidence” is the fact that they cannot actually see the suit. The “rationalizing away” is seen when the characters convince themselves that they can see the suit. Self-deception is a process of denying or rationalizing away the relevance, significance, or importance of opposing evidence and logical arguments.

Should they tell the truth (not being able to see the suit) and accept their own supposed inadequacy, or lie and save themselves from social ridicule? This dilemma combines multiple philosophically interesting issues. When each character within the story is confronted with the invisible suit, they are also confronted with a complex moral dilemma. This story has great potential in being a prompt for philosophical discussion. All versions and translations typically follow the same basic plot, have the same basic elements, and present the same issues.

WHATA THE SORTY WHERE THE KING HAD INVISIBLE ROBES FREE

Feel free to use any version that is available to you if you cannot acquire the one used in this module. Like most stories of such age, this tale has multiple versions and translations, among various authors and story collections.

This story is a classic tale written by the Danish author Hans Christian Andersen, who wrote many famous children’s fairy tales in the 1800s that are still prominent today, such as The Little Mermaid, Thumbelina, and The Ugly Duckling. A child breaks everyone’s delusion by shouting out, “the Emperor is not wearing anything at all!” Guidelines for Philosophical Discussion

Everyone lies and says they can see the suit. Everyone who looks upon the suit is troubled by what they cannot see, and whether they are inadequate or not. The weavers only pretend to weave the suit and present the fake suit to everyone in the city. Two imposter weavers enter his city and tell him they will create a suit for him that would be invisible to stupid people. Do princess polly shoes run small.Questions for Philosophical Discussion » Summary This classic tale raises question about self-deception, conformity, and obedience to authority.Īn Emperor of a city is fond of clothes.

Whata the sorty where the king had invisible robes